Every
message sent here will send a push notification into the mod teams
server. If you're not getting a response timely here... this is a
surefire way to get our attention.
Honestly not really sure what i think of this post.. i'm all for talking and exposing corruption, if in some tangible way it relates to GME and the stock market.. this i'm struggling a bit with, it seems off to me which is why i'm tagging a mod. I asked him to further explain how this relates to GME and i jsut got downvoted no reply yet.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/16n78fs/comment/k1cpqcq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
Unfortunately, this channel is going to be retired. We will be responsive to pings in any channel, using the following commands (depending on who you're looking for).
11:44 PM
11:46 PM
But the bot v5 only sees/links two channels at a time, and this is going to be the sacrificial lamb channel
11:46 PM
I will leave this up for a few days, then archive the channel away.
Actually, in reality I was thinking it might be time to put together a little mega post of your observations so far of what's been going on here. Maybe this weekend?
luma44
Actually, in reality I was thinking it might be time to put together a
little mega post of your observations so far of what's been going on
here. Maybe this weekend?
I thought about posting a mini post saying. "Trust me bro" the mods think way too hard sometimes on what to, and what not to remove. They've apparently got some good ideas & projects, but it would be ashamed if they aren't acheived because they are too busy debating whether or not a shit post should exist lol. That's just me. I'm not gonna post it, I'd like to observe more Thanks for what everyone has been doing for the last 2-3 years!(edited)
The trolls that have perfected not technically breaking any rules but driving good people to break rule 1 are the ones that make you want to day drink because you know that you're going to end up being "too slow" or "compromised and allowing X".
(speaking as Discord mod only)
Hmm. 1) What about saying sheilds must rise, and if it is close to these rules, it will be taken down.
12:22 PM
2) I don't know how hard this would be, but asking for a culture shift. For example, we all know Zen is sort of adopted. But what if a more "killem with kindness is adopted" (the service industry must do this all the time), or like in a video game a spell of "rainbows and happiness"
12:23 PM
And ask, keep your posts "way super happy", we are being attacked, and we need to attack back.
12:25 PM
IDK...i'm thinking of Japanese animie, rainbows, and unicordns, but this idea might not go anywhere. I don't know enough about the threats.
2) I don't know how hard this would be, but asking for a culture shift.
For example, we all know Zen is sort of adopted. But what if a more
"killem with kindness is adopted" (the service industry must do this all
the time), or like in a video game a spell of "rainbows and happiness"
There's definitely that undertone of Teddy BBBYQ stuff.(edited)
11:35 AM
ugh
11:35 AM
That's the ugh of when something is mostly good but has one piece that sort of spoils it
11:35 AM
The guideline that we've used internally in something like this is "is it 90% GME"
11:36 AM
Because there's often one litttttttle piece that references memes or AMC or BBBYQ or TEddy or something. But is it 90% GME is sort of a rough guideline
11:36 AM
For me, this hits the 90% mark and I say we let it ride. Obviously, OP (from the comment section) is a BBBYQ person.(edited)
11:37 AM
But the video is pro-GME and mostly GME, so I'd let it ride. That's simply my opinion. I welcome other input from others
This is a quick jump in and jump out of discord. The 90% GME rule is good, but I wonder if an additional rule is IF it contains X% of (for lack of better words) distraction stocks. I say this, because I was trained as a sales rep. The conversations are: 99% talking about bullshit, then 1% is the actuall sales discussion. So, aside from keeping this a GME focused community, if another side goal is to protect the public from market manipulation in regard to other stocks, maybe the threshold should be raised. Ok Gotta go!
DFV was watching a ton of different stocks. More knowledge is never bad and I think that's the thing that this sub has such a hard time with. So many people are so diehard $GME that they refuse to look at or acknowledge another ticker but that information could potentially teach them about the stock they care so much about.
1
3:56 AM
Censorship is not ideal but it's tricky to walk the fine line on this sub with all the over zealous patrons
SatansBoobieTassel
DFV was watching a ton of different stocks. More knowledge is never bad
and I think that's the thing that this sub has such a hard time with.
So many people are so diehard $GME that they refuse to look at or
acknowledge another ticker but that information could potentially teach
them about the stock they care so much about.
Sure, but Superstonk is a GME subreddit. So anything to do with other stocks needs to be tied back to that to be hosted on our subreddit.
The whole point of Reddit is that users can discuss specific things in specific places. If other stocks want to be discussed on their own then I'm sure a subreddit exists or that they can make one.
1
SatansBoobieTassel
Censorship is not ideal but it's tricky to walk the fine line on this sub with all the over zealous patrons
It's not censorship it's just a GME subreddit... im not opposed to other tickets out of spite, I just don't think they're intelligent investments. I owned popcorn stock for a while. It boomed, I sold, and rightfully so because AA is a snake
^ Thatβs my POV too. Grifters pushing distraction plays trying to compare them to GameStop or stringing people along with wild tinfoil theories with no basis in fact is the reality weβre faced with when we talk about βother tickersβ
I hate to think of the people who lost money in BBBYQ because of grifters like in that shitty podcast that shall not be named
I don't really care who, but i don't think it really does count as debunked as there was a connection, and my change in stance was that this movie was bought out quickly so it couldn't be released earlier?? but in my defense the title is still 'accurate'?
12:30 PM
fuck more than anything i just wouldn't mind someone elses take on the fact that anchorage capitals recent 13 w/e activity indicates they took a massive put on SPY.. like i thought they shut their hedge fund stuff down in 2021..?
I just don't like to kick up too much of a fuss. In the grand scheme of things, i think the movie is a small piece. I could be wrong about that though ββοΈ
While i certainly could've done a better job with the post and highlighting the fact that they dropped out.. why i editted that comment into the top of the post
Looking into it but my guess is it was reflaired because of their HF liquidation in Dec 2021, which as you said might not mean they cease to exist because of the recent filings they made
Waitingonawait
I just don't like to kick up too much of a fuss. In the grand scheme of
things, i think the movie is a small piece. I could be wrong about that
though ββοΈ
While i certainly could've done a better job with the post and
highlighting the fact that they dropped out.. why i editted that comment
into the top of the post
I mean I partly labeled it that because it was about the movie, which seems to be a bit of a trigger for some people lol.. and shitposting is posting content to trigger people, if i'm understanding it correctly?
Explore this conversation and more from the Superstonk community
1:21 PM
oops, linked a comment instead of the main post
Waitingonawait
I mean I partly labeled it that because it was about the movie, which
seems to be a bit of a trigger for some people lol.. and shitposting is
posting content to trigger people, if i'm understanding it correctly?
I was just browsing the above user. Can't find a previous post on our sub. Makes me think that maybe some of these users are paid to post negatively on our sub
I just don't like to kick up too much of a fuss. In the grand scheme of
things, i think the movie is a small piece. I could be wrong about that
though ββοΈ
While i certainly could've done a better job with the post and
highlighting the fact that they dropped out.. why i editted that comment
into the top of the post
I was just browsing the above user. Can't find a previous post on our
sub. Makes me think that maybe some of these users are paid to post
negatively on our sub
I remember reading at one point that scammers would filter victims by if they were willing to sit through long videos. Those who sat through the entire thing would be more conditioned to take actions suggested by the presenter. This guy purposefully doesn't explain their point quickly and concisely.
While it sucks that low karma apes can't do this, I'm also hella hesitant to lowering it to a level for giveaway scraping bots to spam the thread for free shit.
Hi there, if you are here is so much appreciated, all the info I share and all the efforts I put is to share my thoughts on all this gamestop saga, and also to register all the information that I think is important for Apes.
Reddit is built on a foundation of spaghetti. I get that bug too.
(it is supposed to show that they have "a past ban" but it's completely inconsistent)
It had one report and died in new. I let it through. It's from a movie that in no way glorifies Nazi or anything like that. I agree it's meh but the community has voted with it's down votes on this one imo.
My head is about to explode figuring out if this is supposed to be well intentioned deception or bad intentioned deception and how obvious the deception is to everyone in the thread lol
stonkyagraha
My head is about to explode figuring out if this is supposed to be well
intentioned deception or bad intentioned deception and how obvious the
deception is to everyone in the thread lol
I think it's well intentioned. Should definitely include the original unedited video as well so that people can compare and judge the editing themselves.
lmao I remember discovering Gematria, wait till he discovers angel numbers haha. Everyone in there needs to smoke a bowl and op needs to stop smoking em.
Omg that sounds fun! Can I see my mod notes too?
Although, if you feel more inclined to give me the "Hell no!!!" and reject me that's fine too.
Either way it's a win in my eyes. Airtight security or pandering to my subjective curiosity there's something distinctly positive in either scenario.
Omg that sounds fun! Can I see my mod notes too?
Although, if you feel more inclined to give me the "Hell no!!!" and
reject me that's fine too.
Either way it's a win in my eyes. Airtight security or pandering to my
subjective curiosity there's something distinctly positive in either
scenario.
Yeah there's a scene in home alone where the kid drops bricks on the intruders. Definitely meets requirements for no violence but it's semi harmless as the context is a children's movie with booby traps. Idk on this one. I try to not overmkderate memes and shitposts. Anyone else have thoughts on it?
I could see if you didn't know that movie or reference that this one would definitely cross the line for violence... As somebody who watches this movie a couple times a year with my kids I definitely think I would let it slide
Diznavis
But on that note, if I didn't realize it, I'm sure plenty of others
will only see RC with a brick over Kenny's head and not get the
reference.
Definitely a fair point. I'd lean towards leaving it up for this one, I think the movie is popular enough where most folks will get it / find out about it in the comments. I do see the reasoning for pulling with the violence part.
I tend to be pretty strict on violence or calls to violence... So I probably lean towards removal especially if it got reported, But if it hadn't been reported I think I'd let it slide. It is objectively from a kids movie
11:20 AM
If we keep it up maybe it's worth having a sticky with a link to the YouTube clip from that movie so people have context?
luma44
If we keep it up maybe it's worth having a sticky with a link to the YouTube clip from that movie so people have context?
And a note that "SuperStonk does not encourage or advocate violence in any way. However, we recognize that from cultural context, this movie reference is to someone defending their house from criminals when alone, outnumbered, and from a position of perceived weakness, with an eventual triumph due to good planning, willingness to put in work, and unwillingness to back down and flee. May RC similarly put in the work, triumph, and know that he is not alone with so many apes cheering him on." perhaps.
Yeah I removed the comment with the link as spam. I'm under the impression that helps reddit filter links in the future or at least flag us. The post itself I just removed as Improper cause there's a lot wrong with it. Left a niceish message tho cause the OP seems clueless
Some say GME is a conspiracy with the help of some highly awarded posts. Go watch the yt vid by whatever the fuck his name is. He picked the right ones to make all of the investors look like cult members with conspiracy theories.
Lairian -Flairy Type-
Is that a sub rule, or is it a full on reddit rule at this point?
If yβall love conspiracies, you gonna love what Super Share is up to. He has no clue what notional value means and heβs up to his 3rd or 4th βddβ about banks now. And yes, zero real connection to GME
Iβm laying into him now on that wrinkle chat. Mf has the audacity to tell a guy in the comments of his recent post how they have offered nothing of value to the sub. Super is getting a vocab lesson on every term heβs been ignorant to and how many dds are debunked.
Whether said content is actually "non-toxic" is up for debate haha. But having a few strikes can help filter out the baboons from the sneks. Either way change for the better is imminent. As long as it doesn't destroy the current mod load.(edited)
People are reaching their boiling points IRL, that always spills over online. You see the recent statistics on how awful Black Friday sales were this year? Not to mention the average savings statistic.
Not an excuse, but it's very fascinating to watch happen.
People are reaching their boiling points IRL, that always spills over
online. You see the recent statistics on how awful Black Friday sales
were this year? Not to mention the average savings statistic.
Not an excuse, but it's very fascinating to watch happen.
Yea, it's amazing to watch the news spin that the economy is booming and there's no recession incoming.
Wages are stagnant/not growing with inflation.
Food/housing are way more expensive (and are exempt from the inflation figures)
Interest rates to choke a horse.
More than 70% of homes being bought are by companies/hedge funds/conglomerates
Totally anecdotal, but I'm the only person in my friend group living more comfortably than they were 5 years ago.
3:42 PM
Thanks Citadel!
3:42 PM
(Obvious /s for the inevitable screenshot)
Lyrad (Crybad)
Yea, it's amazing to watch the news spin that the economy is booming and there's no recession incoming.
Wages are stagnant/not growing with inflation.
Food/housing are way more expensive (and are exempt from the inflation figures)
Interest rates to choke a horse.
More than 70% of homes being bought are by companies/hedge funds/conglomerates
Totally anecdotal, but I'm the only person in my friend group living more comfortably than they were 5 years ago.